ASM events
This conference is managed by the American Society for Microbiology

Studies using calibrated peer review (CPR)p:/cpr.molsci.ucla.edu

Table of contents
No headers

 

Studies related to Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) 

Gunersel, A.B., N. J.Simpson, K.J. Aufderheide, and L. Wang. 2008. Effectiveness of Calibrated Peer Reviewfor improving writing and critical thinking skills in biology undergraduate students.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8 (2) :25-37.

Bohannan, Z. 2006. Calibrated Peer Review does not improve writing. The America's Intelligence Wire.

Carlson, P. A., and F. C. Berry. 2003. Calibrated Peer Review and assessing learning outcomes. 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.

Carlson, P. A., Berry, F.C. 2005. Calibrated Peer Review: A tool for assessing the process as well as the product in learning outcomes. Pages 1415-1435. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.

Carlson, P. A., Berry, F.C., Voltmer, D. 2003. Using calibrated peer review™ to mediate writing and to assess instructional outcomes. Pages 7593-7605. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.

Chapman, O. L. 1999a. Calibrated peer review (TM). Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 217: U311-U311.

—. 1999b. Calibrated Peer Review:  A writing and critical thinking instructional technology.  (The white paper:  A description of CPR).

Chapman, O. L., Fiore, M.A. 2000. Calibrated Peer Review™. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development: 11-15.

Chickering, J. R. 2001. Implementation of the Molecular Science tools:  Is it as easy as it looks? 222nd ACS National Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Crute, T. D. 2005. Calibrated Peer Review in the laboratory curriculum. 57th Southeast/Southwest Koint Regional Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Memphis, TN.

Donovan, J. B. 2003. My computer, my writing coach. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Bulletin 16: 7.

Freitas, S. S. a. A. A. R. 2000. Teaching for an intuitive understanding of the significance of the equilibrium constant. 219th ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

Furman, B., and W. Robinson. 2003. Improving engineering report writing with Calibrated Peer Review 33rd annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.

Gerdeman, R. D., A. A. Russell, and K. J. Worden. 2007. Web-based student writing and reviewing in a large biology lecture course. Journal of College Science Teaching 36: 46-52.

Hagen, J. P. 2003. Using lab-report grading rubrics with calibrated peer review. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 225: U542-U542.

Kim, S. H., J. Wise, and M. Hillsley. 2005. Learning technical writing skills through peer review: Use of calibrated peer review™ in unit operation lab. Pages 3668-3675. AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings.

Langdon, L. S., and C. F. Bauer. 2005. Writing for all: Road to institutionalizing Calibrated Peer Review(tm) at the University of New Hampshire. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 229: U362-U362.

Margerum, L. 2005. Calibrated peer review (CPR) writing for laboratory experiments with an environmental chemistry focus. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 229: U574-U574.

Margerum, L. D., M. Gulsrud, R. Manlapez, R. Rebong, and A. Love. 2007. Application of calibrated peer review (CPR) writing assignments to enhance experiments with an environmental chemistry focus. Journal of Chemical Education 84: 292-295.

McCarty, T., M. V. Parkes, T. T. Anderson, J. Mines, B. J. Skipper, and J. Grebosky. 2005. Improved patient notes from medical students during Web-based teaching using faculty-calibrated peer review and self-assessment. Academic Medicine 80: S67-S70.

Orth, D. L., and A. W. Ryter. 2002. Incorporation of calibrated peer review writing assignments in general chemistry laboratory and introductory chemistry courses. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 224: U296-U296.

Pelaez, N. J. 2002. Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology. Advances In Physiology Education 26: 174-184.

Perry, M. D. 2003. Web-based writing and homework assignments using calibrated peer review and mastering chemistry. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 225: U347-U347.

Perry, M. D. J. 2001. Molecular Science Project:  Tools for everyone's box. 222nd ACS National Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Plutsky, S., and B. A. Wilson. 2004. Comparison of three methods for teaching and evaluating writing: A quasi-experimental study. Delta Pi Epsilon 46: 50-61.

Prichard, J. R. 2005. Writing to learn:  An evaluation of the Calibrated Peer Review program in two neuroscience courses. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education 4: A34-A39.

Reynolds, J. A., and C. Moskovitz. 2008. Calibrated Peer Review™ assignments in science courses: Are they designed to promote critical thinking and writing skills? Journal of College Science Teaching 38: 60-66.

Rickert, K., L. S. Langdon, and C. F. Bauer. 2004. Calibrated peer Review (R) writing assignments as capstone experiences for chemconnections modules. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 227: U662-U662.

Robinson, R. 2001. Calibrated peer review (TM) - An application to increase student reading & writing skills. American Biology Teacher 63: 474-477.

Russell, A. A. 2001. Molecular Science:  Gearing up for new directions. 222nd ACS National Meeting, Chicago, IL.

—. 2003. Writing about chemistry using calibrated peer review. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 225: U345-U345.

—. 2004. Calibrated Peer Review: 21st Century Pedagogies. Project Kaleidoscope IV: http://www.pkal.org/documents/Vol4CalibratedPeerReview.cfm.

Russell, A. A., and P.J. Kellman. 1999a. What difference does it make?  Assessing the effects of tghe molecular science project learning strategies. 218th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

Russell, A. A., and K. M. Brand. 2005. Calibrated Peer Review:  A writing and critical thinking instructional tool University of California, Los Angeles.

Russell, A. A., and O. L. Chapman. 2001a. Calibrated Peer Review (TM): A writing and critical thinking instructional tool. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 221: U109-U109.

—. 2001b. Evaluating peer review using calibrated peer review. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 222: U220-U220.

Russell, A. A., O.L. Chapman, and P.A. Wegner. 1999b. Molecular science:  a library of resources. 217th ACS National Meeting, Anaheim, CA.

Russell, A. A. a. J. C. 2000. Semivirtual AP chemistry:  A University of California College Preparative (UCCP) initiative. 210th ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

Russell, J., and M. Pearson. 2004. Instructional technology jewels. Journal of College Science Teaching 33: 24-28.

Sady, M. B., A. A. Russell, and T. M. Su. 2002. Calibrated peer review assignment: Identify a chemical. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 224: U296-U297.

Su, T. M., and L. K. Fong. 2001. Using Calibrated Peer Review in the community college general chemistry curriculum. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 222: U220-U220.

Villarba, M., C. Collins, J. CHadwick, J. Magner, and T. Su. 2001. Bringing systemic change to community college chemistry:  Challenges and rewards. 221st ACS National Meeting, San Diego, CA.

Wegner, P. A. 1999. Technology-enabled activity-based learning in general chemistry. 218th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans.

Wimpfheimer, T. 2002. Using calibrated peer review (CPR) in small classes at Salem State College. Abstracts Of Papers Of The American Chemical Society 224: U296-U296.

Wise, J. C., Kim, S. 2004. Better understanding through writing: Investigating calibrated peer review™. Pages 1159-1164. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.

 

Tag page
You must login to post a comment.