Jenny Knight, Ph.D.
Molecular Cell, and Developmental Biology
University of Colorado, Boulder
Boulder, CO 80309-0347
knight@colorado.edu
303-735-1949 (office)
I am
a senior instructor at the University of Colorado, Boulder. I teach
Human Genetics for non-majors and two upper level majors
courses, The Brain (from molecules to behavior), and Developmental
Biology. In addition, I teach an education research
class called Teaching and Learning, primarily for grad students and
post docs. I am also affiliated with an
interdisciplinary group on our campus called the Science Education
Initiative,
which is focused on improving undergraduate science education, and on
carrying
out science education research projects. We have been designing and
testing
pre-post content and attitude assessment tools, as well as studying
peer
interaction in our two large introductory courses. I’ve been using
interactive techniques in my
courses for about 4 years, including clickers, small group work,
concept
mapping, in-class problem solving, and “just-in-time-teaching”.
Analysis of answers to a pre-post genetics assessment tool indicates that majors and non-majors begin and finish genetics with similar and persistent misconceptions. The starting and ending points between the two groups are not identical (the majors start higher and end higher than the non-majors), but the difference is smaller than one might imagine. Focusing on these misconception topics, I propose to characterize the rate at which students repair their misconceptions by gathering data from the pre-test, immediately after instruction on a topic, at the midsemester exams, and finally from the post-test. I will also characterize how majors and non-majors are learning this content through surveys that ask about how the students study, as well as focus group interviews that ask students to work through and talk about challenging genetics problems.
See <Bibliography> page, but the following was particularly interesting to me in thinking about genetics misconceptions:
Lewis,
J and Wood-Robinson, C (2000).Genes,
Chromosomes, Cell Division and Inheritance—Do Students See Any
Relationship? International Journal of
Science Education 22(2): 177-195.
We will use three approaches:
1. Self reflection surveys:
how do students study and attempt to learn genetics
what do students think about science in general (Biology CLASS; see the appendix for a link)
2. Content survey: the Genetics Assessment Tool (multiple choice tool that measures conceptual understanding of genetics)
3. Observations of groups solving genetics problems in class: we will use a rubric to try to characterize the skills that students use or don't use in solving genetics problems
4. Individual interviews: students from the class will be asked to problem solve in an audio or video taped interview.
Please see Findings/methods link for more detail.
See the SoTL Inst Presentation link from the Journal tab, and also additional discussion in Findings, methods.
In brief, we find that majors demonstrate higher knowledge on the GAT at the end of the semester, and have higher learning gains than do non-majors. However, the differences are not very large, and at snapshot time points during the semester (quizzes and exams), the populations are even more similar. This makes it particularly important to investigate how the students are doing their learning. This is where the interviews will come in.
Bio-CLASS link
Genetics Learning Goals (on which the GAT is based, and for the two genetics courses being compared)