I am evaluating whether modelling scientific thinking in the theory component of my microbiology class will engender:
In a nutshell
I changed course from didactic lecturing to active learning classes in which students:
I used data:
Search, evaluate & synthesise scientific literature to construct your own knowledge & understanding of microbiology to:
e.g. analysis of food poisoning outbreak.
e.g. data interpretation from literature - scaffold how to.
e.g. devise data from case scenario.
| Overall SOLO level in final exams | |||
| Year | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 2004 | 41 | 27 | 32 |
| 2005 | 20 | 29 | 51 |
| 2006 | 31 | 21 | 48 |
SOLO
2 = unistructural
3 = multistructural
4 = relational
5 = extended abstract
2004:
Write an essay describing the biogeochemical cycle of nitrogen. Within the context of your essay define the terms reservoir, compartment and flux. Use your description of the nitrogen cycle to evaluate and explain the effects of lake stratification on nutrient cycling. In this context, you should explain why different types of nitrogen metabolism will likely be important at different depths of the water column.
2005:
Figure 1:Cross section of a lake in summer with various factors noted in numbered boxes.
Examine the diagram in figure 1 above and write an essay that shows that you understand the impacts or effects of each of the numbered boxes and how they are all interrelated. Your essay should also include a comparison of what these factors are likely to be doing in winter where this is also the rainy season. For the purposes of this essay assume that the summer is hot with little or no rain.
| Grade distribution in Applied Environmental Microbiology | |||||||
| Year | Enrolled | HD | DN | CR | PP | TP | NN |
| 2001 | 33 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 5 |
| 2002 | 26 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 2005 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 2006 | 24 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 1 |
Apply SOLO evaluation to student answers to confirm or not cognitive level data.
Greatly increased student engagement with content:
| File | Size | Date | Attached by | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exam comparison.xls No description | 72 kB | 19:40, 29 Jul 2008 | cburke | Actions | ||
I am thinking that something like the think-alouds that we heard about today might be a way for you to approach the 'what is' for what is going on with the students. You believe there is surface learning and not much conceptual change - but to what extent is that true? And is it true in the same way for all students? It might be interesting to investigate this more, also.
Posted 16:46, 18 Jul 2008#2Edit
cburke says:
#1tbalser says:
What is 'modeling' as you use the term - how can it be broken down to a set of skills or actions that you will take that might help you further determine what it is you are doing that is helping the students in the ways you hope?
Posted 16:42, 18 Jul 2008
Posted 20:25, 29 Jul 2008#3Edit
cburke says:
tbalser says:
Again - very interesting and I suspect they will really enjoy the class! But I am not quite 100% sure how you are linking the new activities to modeling scientific thinking. Can you draw that link more clearly in your proposed work? I think that will be valuable for when you go to publish it.
Posted 16:48, 18 Jul 2008
Posted 20:27, 29 Jul 2008#4Edit
cburke says:
#1jknight says:
The fact that your grade distribution doesn't change is ok...because your questions are harder and different! As you said, you can't really compare the overall scores of the exams between years....
Posted 14:14, 19 Jul 2008
Posted 20:28, 29 Jul 2008#5Edit
cburke says:
#1jknight says:
Characterize student comments from previous years and current years (from course evaluations) so that you can use that information as data as well.
Posted 14:17, 19 Jul 2008#2ahoskinson says:
I'm not sure you have to think of objectives as a tradeoff between content and process - perhaps it would relieve both you and your colleagues if you were to define your objectives as encompassing both!
Posted 14:26, 19 Jul 2008
Posted 20:29, 29 Jul 2008#6Edit
cburke says:
#2ahoskinson says:
I'm not sure you have to think of objectives as a tradeoff between content and process - perhaps it would relieve both you and your colleagues if you were to define your objectives as encompassing both!
Posted 14:26, 19 Jul 2008
Posted 20:29, 29 Jul 2008#7Edit
cburke says: